Re: Slaves and combat
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:11 pm
I belive slaves still aren't considered "equipment" and while a slave it's an RP investment I belive equiment slots are saved for things that confer beneficts to combat (short of one or two exceptions which for the same reasons I don't see fitting there).
I'm not really sure with what you mean by upkeep SB. I don't see how a slave would require maintnance since they are player characters and like all other are assumed to gain their own money (even if just those 20 mhl) to be able to survive on their own if needed. The upkeep is no more than a tax paid monthly for the slave and thus you are paying for something that's yours.
Also no you can't treat a slave how you want since you can't mistreat a slave for the sake of doing it since they have rights and the ISA will see to it. Is there a lot of room to play? Yes, but you are not free to treat a slave to your liking.
Again this is not an attack on how the things work, it's my personal view of things. And yes, there might be others who think the same but I'm speaking for myself alone.
I'm not really sure with what you mean by upkeep SB. I don't see how a slave would require maintnance since they are player characters and like all other are assumed to gain their own money (even if just those 20 mhl) to be able to survive on their own if needed. The upkeep is no more than a tax paid monthly for the slave and thus you are paying for something that's yours.
Also no you can't treat a slave how you want since you can't mistreat a slave for the sake of doing it since they have rights and the ISA will see to it. Is there a lot of room to play? Yes, but you are not free to treat a slave to your liking.
Again this is not an attack on how the things work, it's my personal view of things. And yes, there might be others who think the same but I'm speaking for myself alone.